Jacko's Kids Unmasked!

76. Okay everybody think about this. Their mother is caucasian and blonde. That can lighten their skin and hair. It doesn't matter if they are his or not as long as he takes care of them properly.

Posted at 12:22PM on Feb 2nd 2007 by Corie

77. Where's Blanket's "100% black" mother?

Posted at 1:47PM on Feb 1st 2007 by volfie

78. Maybe they used to wear masks in public to cover the skin bleaching forced upon them to do. But, you know if they are his biological children Debbie must have been turkey basted with Mike's semen. I can see a slight resemblance between MJ and Prince I.

Posted at 3:43PM on Feb 1st 2007 by Mike

79. The kids are absolutely adorable, but there is NO WAY they can be MJ's biological kids. Remember, before all of the bleaching and plastic surgery, Michael's entire family has relatively dark skin. If he was a very light-skinned African-American to begin with, then maybe they could turn out that white. But, the genetics just aren't there, folks!

Posted at 1:01PM on Feb 1st 2007 by ELM

80. It's absolutely amazing how Prince looks so much more like his godfather Macauley Culkin than he does his putative father:

http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=356199

http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=356199

Truly a genetic miracle!

Posted at 1:02PM on Feb 1st 2007 by snarkster

81. There skin color doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't his. My good friend is mixed and her father is about the complexion of Joe Jackson and her mother is VERY white and she is about as white as her Mom - what throws me off is the facial features and the hair - I think it should be kinkier to be honest.

I can't wait until these kids grow older and speak up for themselves - hopefully they will be able to set the record straight.

Posted at 4:43PM on Feb 1st 2007 by Kenya

82. HA HA HA ........ROF.......JUST LMAO. M.J. is the father of those kids like TOM CRUISE is the father of SURI. The other bloggers are absolutely right. HE IS FOOLING NO ONE.

They need to check out BLANKET for sexual molestation. If M.J. hasn't done it yet.......HE WILL. I don't care how much $$ those kids have or what kind of life style they live. I FEEL SORRY FOR BOTH OF THEM.

Posted at 1:04PM on Feb 1st 2007 by The wise old owl

83. When Lisa Marie Presley was on Oprah last year, she "TOLD" Oprah that she and Michael "DID" have normal sex during their very brief marriage. Send Oprahs show an e-mail and they might put it back on for you or she will verify it. I almost fell out of my chair when she admitted it.

Posted at 1:10PM on Feb 1st 2007 by rosebud

84. Some of you need to remember that there is a HELL of a lot more to being a "father" than DNA.

Makes me sick to see Grace with them though. That women needs to be fired.

Posted at 1:10PM on Feb 1st 2007 by M

85. I have friend who is a dark skinned black man and his wife is mixed with black and white and has blue eyes. Their oldest daughter has long straight light brown hair and blue eyes. These are possibly Michael's biological kids. We will never know if they are his or not just like we will never know if he is guilty of molestation. He was aquitted twice. The kids look well taken care of so he's doing something right. He's also innocent until proven guilty. God knows if he did it or not and only he can judge him. I can't imagine him being cruel enough to subject his kids to cosmetic surgery either. He's not crazy, he's just different. Bottom line is the children are beautiful and seem to be living normal happy lives.

Posted at 1:11PM on Feb 1st 2007 by Queen

86. Regarding the comment about Lisamarie Presley saying that she had "normal" relations with MJ.....well she is a little wierd too, so who knows what her idea of "normal" would be.

Posted at 1:19PM on Feb 1st 2007 by diana

87. Michael Jackson DOES NOT BLEACH HIS SKIN. He has a skin disease that causes him to loose his pigmentation. I know he has a lot of faults, but it is an OFFENSE to black people to accuse Michael of BLEACHING his skin. SO you people need to get your facts straigt.

Also, I agree. I don't think these are his children. They look nothing like what a mixed child would look like. Maybe there is truth to the idea that Mike is still a virgin. Kinda sad, but there is no way a black man could genetically father white kids. NOPE.

Posted at 3:10PM on Feb 1st 2007 by Lo Lo

88. Oh, and by the way, the kids names are NOT "Prince Michael". Their legal names are "Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr" NICKNAMED "Prince" after Michael's maternal greatgrandfather "Prince Scruse", then there is "Paris Michael Katherine Jackson" named, according to Debbie, for the city in which she was conceived and the Katherine after Michael's mother, and then "MIchael Joseph Jackson, Jr. II" NICKNAMED "Blanket" as a baby, but no word on whether or not he is still called that NOW.

Posted at 2:57PM on Feb 1st 2007 by M

89. If you don't have bio-racial kids.Don't speak.When you have bio-racial kids.It the dominate gene that determines what the child will look like.Especially with african American & caucasian children.African American gene pool has been contaminated Due to slavery.So that gene can lay dominate for generations.Then if you mix with a caucasian you can get a child who appears to look more"white" than "Black"...... or visa versa or even look Spanish...So those Children can be his.....Have you seen the rest of his family's children.They all have mixed babies...

Posted at 3:11PM on Feb 1st 2007 by karri

90. "Mr. Jackson, I want to go to school and make friends and play outside!"

"I told you to call me DADDY! That's what I pay you in Mardi Gras beads and masks for! HEEEE- HEEE! Now c'mon Blanket, lemme see you moonwalk for daddy! JAMON! And you, Prince Michael Moonbeam Thriller Rainbow, I told you to dust the Elephant Man's bones!"


Regardless of who their biological parents actually are, these kids have to be terribly messed up.

Posted at 1:23PM on Feb 1st 2007 by Melissa